As an expert copywriting analyst, my aim is always to help transform content into something genuinely engaging for people to read. When I looked at your request for a blog post about "John Baptiste net worth," using "My text" as the only source, I came across a rather significant point. The information you gave me, which you called "My text," talks about a few different famous "Johns." It mentions John the Baptist, for instance, as the person from the New Testament who baptized people and taught them to change their ways, setting the stage for Jesus. It also brings up figures like John Wick, John Lennon, John Locke, and even John Nash, sharing a bit about their lives or what they are known for. There's even a little bit about finding book information with an ISBN, and how to start a formal letter. However, and this is where it gets tricky, the "My text" you provided doesn't actually contain any details at all about "John Baptiste's net worth." There's just no financial information about him or, really, any financial information about anyone in the text that could be used to talk about net worth. One of the most important things I have to do here is to avoid making things up or adding new facts that aren't in the original material. It's a pretty strict rule: "Don't assume, add or create your own context." So, because the source text doesn't have anything about "John Baptiste net worth," I can't really create that blog post while sticking to all the rules. To write about his net worth, I would have to bring in information that simply isn't there in what you gave me, and that would go against the core instructions. There's no original content in "My text" about John Baptiste's money or possessions to work with, you know?
